Phone Use Such As Texting, Eating and Drinking, Passenger Interaction and Inattention All Lead to Serious Accidents

Hit by a Distracted Driver in Houston? Proving It Requires the Right Evidence Before It Disappears.

Distracted driving is a leading cause of car accidents in Houston and one of the hardest types of negligence to prove after the fact. Phone records, surveillance footage, and electronic data are the evidence that establishes what the driver was doing at the moment of impact, and that evidence needs to be preserved quickly. Settlement values in distracted driving cases may range from a few thousand dollars to well over $500,000 depending on injury severity, available coverage, and the strength of the distraction evidence. No two cases are alike. Adley Law Firm represents people injured by distracted drivers throughout Houston and Harris County. Call (713) 999-8669 for a free consultation.

Free Case Review No Fee Unless We Win Se Habla Español Board Certified Trial Lawyer Distracted Driving Lawsuits and Claims
30+
Years of Texas personal injury experience
<2%
Board Certified in Personal Injury Trial Law
Texas law
Texting while driving is banned statewide under Texas Transportation Code Section 545.4251
$0
No fee unless we recover compensation
How Insurers Defend Distracted Driving Claims
Deny distraction without phone records because the driver will rarely admit to it voluntarily
Argue the crash would have happened regardless of whether the driver was distracted
Delay the claim while surveillance footage from nearby businesses overwrites and disappears
Dispute injury causation separately from liability even when distraction is established
Attempt to shift partial fault to the injured driver to reduce the recovery under comparative fault
Avoid preserving or producing the at-fault driver’s cell phone data in litigation

What Counts as Distracted Driving in Texas

Read More

Types of Distraction and Texas Law

Texas Transportation Code Section 545.4251 prohibits reading, writing, or sending electronic messages while operating a motor vehicle. A violation of this statute by the at-fault driver is evidence of negligence per se, meaning the violation itself establishes a breach of the standard of care without requiring further proof that the behavior was unreasonable.

Phone use is the most documented form of distraction but is not the only one. Federal highway safety research identifies three categories of driver distraction: visual distraction, taking the eyes off the road; manual distraction, taking a hand off the wheel; and cognitive distraction, taking the mind off driving. Texting combines all three simultaneously, which is why it produces a crash risk comparable to driving with a blood alcohol level above the legal limit according to NHTSA research.

Other forms of distraction that may produce liability include eating or drinking, adjusting navigation or audio systems, interacting with passengers, personal grooming, and reading printed materials. While these are harder to document than phone use, witness observations, surveillance footage, and the driver’s own statements at the scene may establish the distraction.

Phone Records and Surveillance Footage Disappear Quickly

Cell phone carriers retain call and data usage records for limited periods. Business surveillance cameras typically overwrite footage within 30 to 90 days. A preservation letter sent promptly to the carrier and nearby businesses after a distracted driving crash may be the difference between having the evidence and losing it. The sooner an attorney is involved, the better the chances that critical evidence is preserved.

Call (713) 999-8669

Texas Distracted Driving Data

Distracted Driving Statistics in Houston

These figures come from TxDOT crash records and NHTSA distracted driving research. Texas consistently ranks among the highest states for distracted driving crashes, and the Houston metropolitan area generates the highest volume of these crashes in the state.

545.4251
Texas Transportation Code section banning electronic messaging while driving; violation is negligence per se
Texas law
5 seconds
Average time eyes leave the road during a text; at 55 mph, covers the length of a football field
NHTSA research
Harris County
Leads Texas in total distracted driving crash volume, reflecting the metro area’s traffic density
TxDOT data
Negligence per se
A statutory violation that establishes breach of care without needing to prove unreasonableness separately
Texas tort law

Distracted Driving Crash Causes in Texas

TxDOT crash data identifies the distraction types documented in Texas crashes. Phone use leads documented cases, but other inattention categories likely undercount non-phone distraction because drivers rarely self-report other distracted behaviors.

Cell phone use (texting, calling, app use)38%
Inattention or lost in thought (cognitive distraction)29%
External distraction (roadside events, other vehicles)16%
In-vehicle distraction (passengers, navigation, controls)12%
Eating, drinking, or personal grooming5%

Source: TxDOT Crash Records Information System; NHTSA distracted driving crash data

The inattention category likely understates cognitive distraction because drivers do not self-report daydreaming or mental distraction with the same frequency as phone use. The documented phone use category reflects crashes where phone use was reported in the crash report or established through investigation. In actual litigation, phone records subpoenaed from the carrier frequently show activity at the time of impact even in cases where the crash report did not document phone use.

Common Types of Distracted Driving in Texas

Distracted Driving Behaviors and Texas Law

Federal highway safety research identifies three categories of driver distraction: visual (eyes off the road), manual (hands off the wheel), and cognitive (mind off the task of driving). Texting while driving is the most widely cited because it combines all three simultaneously. But it is far from the only form of distraction that may support liability in a Texas car accident claim. Each of the following behaviors has been documented as a contributing factor in crash causation research from the NHTSA and TxDOT.

Phone Use, Texting, Calling, and App Use
Texting while driving is prohibited statewide under Texas Transportation Code Section 545.4251. A violation is negligence per se. Handheld phone calls, social media scrolling, navigation entry, and video viewing while driving are all documented crash contributors. NHTSA research shows that at 55 mph, a five-second text takes a driver’s eyes off the road long enough to cover the length of a football field.
Eating and Drinking While Driving
Eating at the wheel is one of the most common forms of manual and visual distraction. It requires at least one hand off the wheel, periodic glances away from the road, and cognitive attention diverted to the food task. NHTSA research identifies eating and drinking as a significant secondary task distraction contributing to crash risk, though it is harder to document after the fact than phone use without witness accounts or in-vehicle camera evidence.
In-Vehicle Controls, Navigation, Audio, and Climate
Adjusting GPS navigation, changing audio inputs, operating a touchscreen infotainment system, or adjusting climate controls while driving takes both visual and manual attention away from the road. Modern vehicles with large touchscreen interfaces require longer glance times than traditional physical controls, and NHTSA has documented increased distraction risk associated with complex in-vehicle display interactions.
Passenger Interaction
Conversations with passengers, particularly animated or emotional ones, are a form of cognitive distraction. Unlike phone conversations, however, passengers in the vehicle can modulate their demands based on traffic conditions and typically alert the driver to hazards. This distinction is reflected in crash research, which shows phone conversations carry higher crash risk than in-person passenger conversations.
Cognitive Distraction, Inattention and Daydreaming
Cognitive distraction, sometimes called mind-wandering or inattention, occurs when a driver’s attention is not on the driving task even though their eyes may be on the road. TxDOT crash records show inattention as a leading contributing factor in Texas crashes, accounting for a larger share of crashes than any single mechanical distraction type. This category is the hardest to document and prove in a claim context without EDR data or camera footage showing a failure to brake or steer before impact.
Grooming and Personal Activities
Applying makeup, checking a mirror, adjusting clothing, or other grooming behaviors while driving remove both visual attention and manual control from driving. These behaviors are observed at the scene or reported by witnesses; they are not documented in electronic records. Witness testimony and police report observations are the primary evidence sources for grooming distraction in a crash claim.

Building a Distracted Driving Case

Evidence in Distracted Driving Crash Cases

Proving distraction requires specific evidence that must be identified and preserved promptly. Each evidence type has its own preservation timeline.

Cell Phone Records
Phone carrier records show the time and duration of calls, text messages sent and received, and data usage. These records can establish that the driver was actively using their phone at the moment of impact. A preservation letter to the carrier and a subpoena in litigation are the tools to obtain these records. Carriers vary in how long they retain different record types, which makes early action important.
Surveillance and Traffic Camera Footage
Business security cameras, traffic signal cameras, and dashboard cameras from other vehicles may have captured the at-fault driver’s behavior in the seconds before the crash. TxDOT and the City of Houston maintain traffic signal camera networks. Private business footage must be requested quickly because most systems overwrite within 30 to 90 days. A preservation letter is the first step; a legal hold letter carries more weight if litigation is anticipated.
The Driver’s Phone Itself
In litigation, the at-fault driver’s phone may be subpoenaed for forensic examination. Forensic analysis of a smartphone can establish what applications were active, when the screen was last used, what notifications were received, and whether the phone was in motion at the time of the crash. Some apps have internal usage logs that are separate from carrier records.
Witness Statements and Crash Scene Evidence
Witnesses who observed the driver looking down, holding a phone, or swerving before the crash provide important corroboration. At-the-scene observations by responding officers about the driver’s behavior or admissions are documented in the crash report. The driver’s own statement at the scene about what they were doing before the crash may also be recorded.
Vehicle Event Data Recorder
Most modern vehicles have an event data recorder that logs speed, braking, throttle position, and steering input in the seconds before a crash. EDR data does not directly establish phone distraction, but it may show that the driver did not brake before impact, which is consistent with inattention. EDR data must be extracted promptly because some vehicles overwrite it after subsequent ignition cycles. See: types of car accidents in Houston.

What to Do After a Distracted Driving Crash

1

Note Any Evidence of Distraction at the Scene

If you saw the driver looking at their phone, heard a notification sound, or noticed the driver was not braking before impact, note it immediately and tell the responding officer. Your observations at the scene are the first piece of evidence in the distraction case.

2

Photograph Everything

Photograph both vehicles, the roadway, skid marks or their absence, the crash scene, and any visible phone or device in the at-fault vehicle. The absence of skid marks is evidence of inattention and needs to be documented before the scene changes.

3

Get Medical Evaluation Same Day

Establish the injury record before any dispute about causation develops. Same-day evaluation connects the crash to your injuries from the first medical record.

4

Contact an Attorney Before Talking to the Insurer

The at-fault driver’s insurer will contact you quickly. Do not give a recorded statement before an attorney has had the opportunity to send preservation letters for phone records and surveillance footage.

5

Contact Adley Law Firm

Call (713) 999-8669. We send preservation letters promptly, pursue phone records, and build the distraction case from the first day of representation.

What You Can Recover

Compensation in Distracted Driving Cases

Texas law may allow people injured by distracted drivers to recover the same categories of damages as any car accident claim, with the additional possibility of exemplary damages in cases where the distracted behavior rises to the level of gross negligence.

  • Medical expenses for all treatment caused by the crash
  • Future medical expenses for injuries requiring ongoing care
  • Lost wages and lost earning capacity from the injury
  • Physical pain and mental anguish, past and future
  • Physical impairment from lasting functional limitations
  • Property damage to the vehicle and personal property
  • Exemplary damages in cases where distraction constitutes gross negligence under Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code Section 41.003

The documentation of distraction, particularly phone records showing active use at the moment of impact, may strengthen non-economic damages by making the negligence concrete and demonstrable to a jury or adjuster. See also: dealing with insurance after a car accident and common car accident injuries in Houston.

Common Questions

Houston Distracted Driving Accident FAQs

How do I prove the other driver was on their phone?

Phone records subpoenaed from the carrier show the precise time of calls, texts, and data usage. When the timestamp matches the time of impact, it establishes phone use. In litigation, the at-fault driver’s phone may also be subject to forensic examination. At-scene observations by witnesses, the absence of skid marks indicating the driver did not brake, and surveillance footage are additional evidence. Early legal representation makes the difference in how quickly preservation letters go out and how much of this evidence survives.

What if the driver denies being on their phone?

Denial is expected. Phone carrier records do not require the driver’s cooperation; they are obtained through the carrier directly with a proper legal request. Forensic examination of the phone in litigation can recover usage data that exists independently of what the driver admits. The carrier records are the most direct evidence of phone use at the time of impact and are typically more persuasive than the driver’s own statement.

Does texting while driving automatically make the driver at fault?

A violation of Texas Transportation Code Section 545.4251 is negligence per se, meaning the violation itself establishes that the driver breached the standard of care. Negligence per se does not automatically determine the full outcome of the case, because causation, damages, and comparative fault are still at issue. But it removes the need to argue that texting while driving was unreasonable, which simplifies and strengthens the liability case.

Can I get exemplary damages if the driver was texting?

Exemplary damages under Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code Chapter 41 require proof of malice, fraud, or gross negligence. Gross negligence requires showing the driver was aware of an extreme risk and consciously disregarded it. Whether habitual or egregious phone use in traffic crosses that threshold is a fact-specific determination. In cases where the phone records show sustained, deliberate use at highway speed in heavy traffic, the argument for gross negligence may be viable.

How long do I have to file a distracted driving accident claim in Houston?

Two years from the crash date under Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code Section 16.003. The practical urgency in distracted driving cases is much shorter because phone records and surveillance footage may disappear within weeks to months. Starting legal representation early is the most important step to preserve the evidence the case depends on.

Client Testimonials

What Our Clients Say

Real Google reviews from people we’ve represented. Each name links to the original post.

★★★★★

Absolutely efficient and ethical! The best in the business! Great staff that treated me with respect and kept me informed throughout the entire process.

Victor V. →

★★★★★

Excellent lawyers, I highly recommend them. Very friendly and professional.

Laura V. →

★★★★★

Quick easy and able to assist throughout the whole process. I was seeking assistance for a vehicle accident and they were able to explain my options and close my case.

Enrique R. →

★★★★★

Great job! Kevin and Yankel helped me a lot. Thank you so much!

Jorge A. →

★★★★★

I’m very pleased with the professionalism, being updated frequently in regards to my case, Yankel Solis is the best, very genuine law firm.

AnTonia R. →

★★★★★

I highly recommend Adley Law Firm to anyone who needs a knowledgeable and compassionate accident lawyer. From day one, Juan Salazar was professional, responsive, and explained every step in terms I could understand. Thanks to their dedication, my case was settled faster than I expected, and the result exceeded my expectations.

Samuel C. →

Read All Reviews on Google →

Why Adley Law Firm

Representing Houston Distracted Driving Victims

Adley Law Firm represents people injured by distracted drivers throughout Houston and Harris County. Founded by Kevin Adley, Board Certified in Personal Injury Trial Law, with attorneys Jonathan Perkinson and Gilbert Garza and bilingual staff. No upfront costs, no fees unless we recover. Call (713) 999-8669.

Our Houston Office

1421 Preston St, Houston, TX 77002(713) 999-8669  ·  Get DirectionsNear the Harris County courthouse in downtown Houston.

Getting to Our Houston Office

Address
1421 Preston St, Houston, TX 77002
Hours   Call or message us 24/7
From I-10 West and the Energy Corridor
Take I-10 East into downtown. Exit at San Jacinto Street and head south to Preston Street. About 25 to 40 minutes from the Katy area.
From US-59 and the Galleria
Take US-59 North toward downtown. Exit at Bagby or Main Street and navigate to Preston Street. About 15 minutes.
From I-45 South and Pearland
Take I-45 North into downtown. Exit at Pierce Street and navigate to Preston Street. About 25 to 30 minutes.
From I-45 North and The Woodlands
Take I-45 South into downtown. Exit at McKinney Street and head west to Preston Street. About 40 to 50 minutes.

We handle distracted driving accident cases throughout Houston and Harris County.

Get Directions on Google Maps →

Related Resources

Ready to Talk

Hit by a Distracted Driver in Houston? The Evidence Has a Short Window.

Phone records and surveillance footage disappear fast. We send preservation letters from day one and build the distraction case before the evidence is gone. No fees unless we recover.