(713) 977-9000

Existing Clients

Understanding the Texas One-Bite Rule: A Guide for Dog Owners and Bite Victims

Free Case Evaluation

Trust ReefTrust Reef

Texas, known for its diverse landscapes and warm hospitality, is also home to a unique set of laws governing dog bite incidents. Among these is the Texas One-Bite Rule, a legal doctrine that has significant implications for both dog owners and bite victims.

This article provides an in-depth look at the Texas One-Bite Rule, its legal implications, and the responsibilities it places on dog owners.

The Texas One-Bite Rule Explained

The Texas One-Bite Rule is a legal principle that determines when a dog owner can be held liable for injuries caused by their pet. Stemming from the landmark case of Marshall v. Ranne in 1974, the rule posits that a dog owner is only liable for bite injuries if they knew or should have known that their dog had aggressive tendencies or a history of biting. In essence, the rule suggests that every dog gets “one free bite” before the owner can be considered aware of the pet’s propensity for harm.

This doctrine may seem to offer a shield for dog owners, but it also underscores the importance of being vigilant about a dog’s behavior. Once a dog has demonstrated aggression, the owner is expected to take reasonable steps to prevent future incidents, or they could face liability for any harm the dog causes.

Legal Implications of the One-Bite Rule

Under the One-Bite Rule, establishing owner liability hinges on the dog’s history. If a dog has previously bitten someone or shown signs of aggression, and the owner was aware of this behavior, they could be held responsible for subsequent bites. Conversely, if the dog has never exhibited aggressive behavior, or if the owner was unaware of any such tendencies, the rule may not apply.

It’s important to note that the One-Bite Rule does not preclude victims from seeking compensation based on other legal grounds, such as negligence.

Negligence in Dog Bite Cases

Negligence is a separate legal avenue through which dog bite victims can pursue compensation. Unlike the One-Bite Rule, a negligence claim does not require proof of the dog’s prior aggression. Instead, victims must demonstrate that the dog owner failed to exercise reasonable care in controlling the pet, leading to the injury.

To establish negligence, the following elements must be proven:

  • Ownership of the animal by the defendant
  • A duty to exercise reasonable care to prevent harm
  • Breach of that duty by the owner
  • Direct causation of the plaintiff’s injury due to the breach

Victims of dog bites can seek the assistance of a Dog Bite Injury Attorney to navigate the complexities of such claims and ensure their rights are protected.

Negligence Per Se and Animal Control Laws

In Texas, violating an animal control law can result in negligence per se. This legal concept automatically deems a person negligent if they violate a statute meant to protect the public, such as leash laws or requirements for securing a dog. If a dog owner’s violation of an animal control law leads to an injury, they may face liability under negligence per se.

For example, Texas Health and Safety Code section 821.077 prohibits the chaining or tethering of a dog under certain conditions. If a dog owner violates this provision and a bite occurs, they could be held accountable for the resulting injuries.

Landlord Liability for Dog Bites

Landlords in Texas may also face liability for dog bite injuries occurring on their property. If a landlord has control over the common areas where a known dangerous dog resides, they could be held responsible for any harm the dog causes. This liability depends on the landlord having actual or constructive knowledge of the dog’s vicious tendencies.

In some cases, a landlord’s failure to act upon this knowledge, such as by not removing the dog from the premises, can lead to legal repercussions. Victims of such incidents can seek guidance from firms like Adley Law Firm to understand their options for recovery.

Bystander Emotional Distress in Texas

Texas law acknowledges the emotional impact that witnessing a traumatic event, like a dog attack, can have on closely related bystanders. While the state allows for the recovery of damages for emotional distress in such cases, it does not permit claims for negligent infliction of mental anguish. This distinction is important for bystanders considering legal action after a dog bite incident.

Defenses to Dog Bite Claims

Dog owners in Texas have several defenses at their disposal when facing dog bite claims. One such defense is comparative negligence, where the victim’s own negligence is considered in determining compensation. If the victim’s actions contributed to the incident, their recovery could be reduced accordingly.

For children involved in dog bite cases, the standard of care is based on the behavior expected of a similarly aged child, not an adult. This can influence the outcome of a claim involving a minor.

Additionally, Texas has abolished the defense of assumption of the risk due to comparative negligence statutes. This means that even if a victim was aware of the potential danger posed by a dog, the owner might still be held liable for injuries.

(End of the first half of the article)

Criminal Penalties for Dog Attacks

While civil liability addresses compensation for the victim, Texas law also provides for criminal penalties for owners of vicious dogs. If a dog’s unprovoked attack causes serious injury or death, the owner can face felony charges, particularly if the attack occurred due to the owner’s criminal negligence or if it happened outside the dog’s secure enclosure. However, enforcement of these penalties is relatively rare, despite the severity of the law.

Case Studies and Precedents

Legal precedents play a crucial role in shaping the application of the One-Bite Rule. Texas courts have seen numerous cases that have tested the boundaries and interpretation of this doctrine. A detailed analysis of these cases can provide valuable insights into how the rule is applied and what factors are considered in determining liability. For those affected by a dog bite incident, studying these precedents with the help of a legal professional can be instrumental in building a strong case.

The Role of a Dog Bite Lawyer

Navigating the aftermath of a dog bite can be complex and challenging. A Dog Bite Lawyer plays a pivotal role in guiding victims through the legal process, from understanding the One-Bite Rule to pursuing a negligence claim. Legal experts in this field can help victims gather evidence, establish liability, and seek fair compensation for their injuries, including medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

Preventative Measures for Dog Owners

To avoid liability under the One-Bite Rule and negligence claims, dog owners should take proactive steps to ensure their pets do not pose a danger to others. This includes proper training, socialization, and adherence to local animal control laws. Owners should also ensure their dogs are securely enclosed and restrained, particularly if they have shown signs of aggression in the past.


The Texas One-Bite Rule is a nuanced legal doctrine that balances the responsibilities of dog owners with the rights of bite victims. Understanding this rule, along with related negligence and liability laws, is crucial for anyone involved in a dog bite incident. Whether you are a dog owner aiming to prevent future liability or a victim seeking justice for your injuries, it is important to consult with knowledgeable legal professionals, such as those at Adley Law Firm, who can provide tailored advice and representation.

In conclusion, while the One-Bite Rule may offer some protection for dog owners, it also underscores the importance of responsible pet ownership and the potential consequences of failing to control a dangerous animal. By staying informed and prepared, both owners and victims can navigate the legal landscape of dog bite incidents in Texas with confidence.


To further assist our readers, here are some frequently asked questions about the Texas One-Bite Rule:

  • What constitutes a “dangerous dog” in Texas?
    A dangerous dog is one that has made an unprovoked attack causing bodily injury or has behaved in a way that a person would reasonably believe poses a threat of bodily injury.
  • Can a dog owner be held liable for a bite if the victim was trespassing?
    Trespassing may serve as a defense for the dog owner, but liability can still be established if the owner was negligent in preventing the attack.
  • What should a victim do immediately after a dog bite incident?
    Seek medical attention, report the incident to local authorities, document the injuries and circumstances, and consult with a dog bite lawyer.
  • Are certain breeds of dogs subject to stricter liability under the One-Bite Rule?
    The One-Bite Rule does not single out specific breeds. However, a dog’s breed may be considered when evaluating the owner’s knowledge of the dog’s aggressive tendencies.
  • How long does a victim have to file a dog bite claim in Texas?
    The statute of limitations for personal injury claims, including dog bites, is two years from the date of the incident.

For more information or to seek legal assistance regarding a dog bite incident, please visit Adley Law Firm.

Share this article:

Adley Law Firm

Get a FREE consultation with an Experienced Attorney

Need help with your case? Get a one-on-one consultation with an experienced attorney.  Simply fill out the form below for a call back.